Verlanic v. The Supreme Court of the State of Idaho
This text of Verlanic v. The Supreme Court of the State of Idaho (Verlanic v. The Supreme Court of the State of Idaho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho
Re: Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Admonition of Fictitious Authority
ALEX VERLANIC, Supreme Court Docket No. 53008-2025
Petitioner,
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO,
Res ondent
Petitioner verlanic is advised that in accordance with ldaho Appellate Rule 11.2, he is responsible for the validity and accuracy of all legal citations in documents submitted to the Court. Petitioner Verlanic cited "Ybarra v. Nevada Workers' Compensation Board 129 ldaho 740 1997,' "ln Re: Marriage of Hall 134 ldaho 789 2000," and "Brown v ldaho Transportation Department 140 ldaho 629 2005', in his Petition for writ of Mandamus. These cases do not appear to exist. Citing nonexistent case law in documents submitted to this Court or any other court can result in sanctions.
/0 Dated July 7_:,2025.
D rder th
G. Richard Bevan, Chief ustice
ATTES Melanie G pa in, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Verlanic v. The Supreme Court of the State of Idaho, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/verlanic-v-the-supreme-court-of-the-state-of-idaho-idaho-2025.