Home/Idaho Supreme Court/Verlanic v. The Supreme Court of the State of Idaho

Verlanic v. The Supreme Court of the State of Idaho

Idaho Supreme Court·Decided July 7, 2025·No. 53008·Published

Opinion

In the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho

Re: Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Admonition of Fictitious Authority ALEX VERLANIC, Supreme Court Docket No. 53008-2025 Petitioner,

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO,

Res ondent

Petitioner verlanic is advised that in accordance with ldaho Appellate Rule 11.2, he is responsible for the validity and accuracy of all legal citations in documents submitted to the Court. Petitioner Verlanic cited "Ybarra v. Nevada Workers' Compensation Board 129 ldaho 740 1997,' "ln Re: Marriage of Hall 134 ldaho 789 2000," and "Brown v ldaho Transportation Department 140 ldaho 629 2005', in his Petition for writ of Mandamus. These cases do not appear to exist. Citing nonexistent case law in documents submitted to this Court or any other court can result in sanctions.

/0

Dated July 7_:,2025.

D rder th

G. Richard Bevan, Chief ustice

ATTES Melanie G pa in, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Verlanic v. The Supreme Court of the State of Idaho, (Idaho 2025).

Verlanic v. The Supreme Court of the State of Idaho (Verlanic v. The Supreme Court of the State of Idaho) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.