Verjee-Van v. Pierce Cnty.

Washington Supreme Court

Verjee-Van v. Pierce Cnty.

421 P.3d 453, 190 Wash. 2d 1028

Washington Supreme Court·Decided July 11, 2018·No. No. 95677-4·Published

Opinion

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its July 10, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review and the motion to consolidate are both denied.

¶ 4 For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its July 10, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review and the motion to consolidate are both denied.

¶ 4 For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Verjee-Van v. Pierce Cnty., 421 P.3d 453, 190 Wash. 2d 1028 (Wash. 2018).

Pincite

421 P.3d 453 (Verjee-Van v. Pierce Cnty.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.