Verizon New York, Inc. v. Barlam Construction Corp.
90 A.D.3d 1537, 934 N.Y.2d 917
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 2011·No. Appeal No. 1·Published
Opinion
It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present — Smith, J.P, Peradotto, Lindley, Green and Martoche, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Verizon New York, Inc. v. Barlam Construction Corp., 90 A.D.3d 1537, 934 N.Y.2d 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
90 A.D.3d 1537 (Verizon New York, Inc. v. Barlam Construction Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hughes v. Nussbaumer
140 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)