Verity v. Verity

65 N.Y. 1002
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 10, 1985
StatusPublished

This text of 65 N.Y. 1002 (Verity v. Verity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Verity v. Verity, 65 N.Y. 1002 (N.Y. 1985).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Although the order recites that it is on the law and the facts, the opinion makes clear that its basis was the absence of factual support for the Family Court’s conclusion. We agree that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law and, therefore, do not consider the weight of the evidence (see, Matter of Nassau Educ. Ch. of Civ. Serv. Employees Assn. v Great Neck Union Free School Dist., 57 NY2d 658, 660).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 N.Y. 1002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/verity-v-verity-ny-1985.