Veritas Marketing & Research, Inc. v. Entertel, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Veritas Marketing & Research, Inc. v. Entertel, Inc.

641 So. 2d 513, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8452, 1994 WL 460732

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 26, 1994

DocketNo. 93-2262

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 641 So. 2d 513 (Veritas Marketing & Research, Inc. v. Entertel, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Veritas Marketing & Research, Inc. v. Entertel, Inc., 641 So. 2d 513, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8452, 1994 WL 460732 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment piercing the corporate veil and finding Veritas Marketing and Research, Inc. (Veritas) responsible to pay a judgment Entertel,'Inc. had obtained against Telemart Communication Company (Tele-mart) is reversed because there is no evidence or reasonable inferences arising therefrom to support the trial court’s finding that Veritas was organized or used to mislead creditors of Telemart or to perpetrate a fraud upon them. See Dania Jai-Alai Palace, Inc. v. Sykes, 450 So.2d 1114 (Fla.1984); USP Real Estate Inv. Trust v. Discount Auto Parts, Inc., 570 So.2d 386 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); and Steinhardt v. Banks, 511 So.2d 336 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 518 So.2d 1273 (Fla.1987).

REVERSED.

DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment piercing the corporate veil and finding Veritas Marketing and Research, Inc. (Veritas) responsible to pay a judgment Entertel,'Inc. had obtained against Telemart Communication Company (Tele-mart) is reversed because there is no evidence or reasonable inferences arising therefrom to support the trial court’s finding that Veritas was organized or used to mislead creditors of Telemart or to perpetrate a fraud upon them. See Dania Jai-Alai Palace, Inc. v. Sykes, 450 So.2d 1114 (Fla.1984); USP Real Estate Inv. Trust v. Discount Auto Parts, Inc., 570 So.2d 386 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); and Steinhardt v. Banks, 511 So.2d 336 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 518 So.2d 1273 (Fla.1987).

REVERSED.

DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

641 So. 2d 513, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8452, 1994 WL 460732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veritas-marketing-research-inc-v-entertel-inc-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack