Veritas Marketing & Research, Inc. v. Entertel, Inc.

641 So. 2d 513, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8452, 1994 WL 460732
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 26, 1994·No. No. 93-2262·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment piercing the corporate veil and finding Veritas Marketing and Research, Inc. (Veritas) responsible to pay a judgment Entertel,'Inc. had obtained against Telemart Communication Company (Tele-mart) is reversed because there is no evidence or reasonable inferences arising therefrom to support the trial court’s finding that Veritas was organized or used to mislead creditors of Telemart or to perpetrate a fraud upon them. See Dania Jai-Alai Palace, Inc. v. Sykes, 450 So.2d 1114 (Fla.1984); USP Real Estate Inv. Trust v. Discount Auto Parts, Inc., 570 So.2d 386 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); and Steinhardt v. Banks, 511 So.2d 336 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 518 So.2d 1273 (Fla.1987).

REVERSED.

DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Veritas Marketing & Research, Inc. v. Entertel, Inc., 641 So. 2d 513, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8452, 1994 WL 460732 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

641 So. 2d 513 (Veritas Marketing & Research, Inc. v. Entertel, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moran v. Schurger
849 So. 2d 1184 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)