Veri v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

436 So. 2d 348, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20127
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 12, 1983·No. No. AR-28·Published

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Veri appeals the Parole and Probation Commission’s determination of his presumptive parole release date. We affirm. Veri was timely interviewed within six months of his confinement in execution of judgment, Section 947.16(1), Florida Statutes, and was interviewed under the applicable guidelines in effect at the time of the interview; Veri’s ex post facto argument is without merit. May v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 424 So.2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), aff’d, 435 So.2d 834 (Fla. 1983); Britt v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 417 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Overfield v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 418 So.2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Veri v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 436 So. 2d 348, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20127 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

436 So. 2d 348 (Veri v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Overfield v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION
418 So. 2d 321 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
May v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COM'N
435 So. 2d 834 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
May v. Fla. Parole & Probation Com'n
424 So. 2d 122 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Britt v. FLORIDA PAROLE & PROBATION COM'N
417 So. 2d 1079 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)