Verhunce v. Metropolitan Dade County

374 So. 2d 640, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15724
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 21, 1979·No. No. 79-643·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A summary final judgment was entered in favor of Metropolitan Dade County because the appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, had not given the notice required by Section 2-2 of the Code of Metropolitan Dade County, Florida (under the Code, this is a condition prerequisite to a tort claim).

The summary final judgment is reversed upon the authority of Scavella v. Fernandez, 371 So.2d 535 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979),1 with directions to the trial court to proceed with the cause.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Verhunce v. Metropolitan Dade County, 374 So. 2d 640, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15724 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

374 So. 2d 640 (Verhunce v. Metropolitan Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cooper v. Dade County
384 So. 2d 221 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)