Verheul v. Johnston

99 F.2d 757, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2981
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 7, 1938·No. No. 8825·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURTAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s application for writ of habeas corpus. Appellant was indicted for bank robbery committed January 5, 1935, and after plea of guilty was sentenced, on May 31, 1935, to a term of twenty-five years imprisonment. He contends that the indictment stated an offense under the Act of May 18, 1934, ch. 304, 48 Stat. 783, sec. 2(a), 12 U.S.C.A. § 588b, subd. (a), which fixes the maximum penalty at twenty years, and not under subdivision (b), id. sec. 2(b), 12 U.S.C.A. § 588b, subd. (b), which fixes the maximum penalty at twenty-five years. The sentence authorized by 12 U.S.C.A. § 588b, subdivision (a) (20 years) not having expired, the application is premature. Smith v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 83 F.2d 321; Hall v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 86 F.2d 820; Ex parte Mhlendez, 9 Cir., 98 F.2d 791.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Verheul v. Johnston, 99 F.2d 757, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2981 (9th Cir. 1938).

99 F.2d 757 (Verheul v. Johnston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. Bell
137 F.2d 716 (Sixth Circuit, 1943)
Demaurez v. Squier
121 F.2d 960 (Ninth Circuit, 1941)
Verheul v. Johnston
121 F.2d 959 (Ninth Circuit, 1941)