Verheul v. Johnston

99 F.2d 757, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2981
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 7, 1938
DocketNo. 8825
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 99 F.2d 757 (Verheul v. Johnston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Verheul v. Johnston, 99 F.2d 757, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2981 (9th Cir. 1938).

Opinion

PER CURTAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s application for writ of habeas corpus. Appellant was indicted for bank robbery committed January 5, 1935, and after plea of guilty was sentenced, on May 31, 1935, to a term of twenty-five years imprisonment. He contends that the indictment stated an offense under the Act of May 18, 1934, ch. 304, 48 Stat. 783, sec. 2(a), 12 U.S.C.A. § 588b, subd. (a), which fixes the maximum penalty at twenty years, and not under subdivision (b), id. sec. 2(b), 12 U.S.C.A. § 588b, subd. (b), which fixes the maximum penalty at twenty-five years. The sentence authorized by 12 U.S.C.A. § 588b, subdivision (a) (20 years) not having expired, the application is premature. Smith v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 83 F.2d 321; Hall v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 86 F.2d 820; Ex parte Mhlendez, 9 Cir., 98 F.2d 791.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. Bell
137 F.2d 716 (Sixth Circuit, 1943)
Demaurez v. Squier
121 F.2d 960 (Ninth Circuit, 1941)
Verheul v. Johnston
121 F.2d 959 (Ninth Circuit, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 F.2d 757, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/verheul-v-johnston-ca9-1938.