Verges v. Noel

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Verges v. Noel

17 La. Ann. 67

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 15, 1865

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 17 La. Ann. 67 (Verges v. Noel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Verges v. Noel, 17 La. Ann. 67 (La. 1865).

Pincite

Opinion

Howell, J.

Appellant was sued as endorser of a note, on which judgment, confirming a default, was rendered against him, upon evidence in the record, consisting of the note, protest and notices of protest.

He has assigned no error nor furnished a brief.

Plaintiff, in his brief, asks for the affirmance of the judgment, with damages for a frivolous appeal.

Having filed no answer to the appeal, as required by Art. 890 C. P., no damages can be awarded. Counsel’s brief is not considered an answer, 4 A. 150; 5 A. 146; 8 A. 73.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howell, J.

Appellant was sued as endorser of a note, on which judgment, confirming a default, was rendered against him, upon evidence in the record, consisting of the note, protest and notices of protest.

He has assigned no error nor furnished a brief.

Plaintiff, in his brief, asks for the affirmance of the judgment, with damages for a frivolous appeal.

Having filed no answer to the appeal, as required by Art. 890 C. P., no damages can be awarded. Counsel’s brief is not considered an answer, 4 A. 150; 5 A. 146; 8 A. 73.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 La. Ann. 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/verges-v-noel-la-1865.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack