Vergari v. Ward
This text of 60 A.D.2d 949 (Vergari v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered January 14, 1977 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, seeking to compel respondents to recompute the parole eligibility dates of four persons incarcerated in State correctional facilities. The petitioner contends that as a matter of law the respondents erred in computing the parole eligibility dates of multiple offenders by crediting them with time served on a prior undischarged sentence for purposes of the minimum period of a newly imposed concurrent sentence (Penal Law, § 70.30, subd 1, par [a]; § 70.25, subd 1). While petitioner characterizes the credit of time served on prior sentences in computing the minimum served on a subsequent concurrent sentence as "preposterous”, we affirm for the reasons set forth by Special Term in its decision (Matter of Vergari v Ward, 88 Misc 2d 911). In addition, this court has only recently held that time served on prior undischarged sentences made concurrent by a sentencing court with a new sentence is to be credited in computing the completion date of the minimum sentence for purposes of parole eligibility (People ex rel. Ternaku v LeFevre, 58 AD2d 932). Judgment affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur. [88 Misc 2d 911.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 A.D.2d 949, 401 N.Y.S.2d 319, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vergari-v-ward-nyappdiv-1978.