Vergara v. Butter

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vergara v. Butter

568 So. 2d 976, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7671, 1990 WL 149810

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 9, 1990

DocketNo. 90-1029

StatusPublished

This text of 568 So. 2d 976 (Vergara v. Butter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vergara v. Butter, 568 So. 2d 976, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7671, 1990 WL 149810 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Raul Vergara, plaintiff below, appeals a final order dismissing his second amended complaint with prejudice. After review of the briefs and record herein, we concur with the trial court that the second amended complaint did not state a cause of action, see Nickolauson v. Rhyne, 529 So.2d 365 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), and that if any cause of action did exist, it would be barred by the statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4), Fla.Stat. (1989). The order under review is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Raul Vergara, plaintiff below, appeals a final order dismissing his second amended complaint with prejudice. After review of the briefs and record herein, we concur with the trial court that the second amended complaint did not state a cause of action, see Nickolauson v. Rhyne, 529 So.2d 365 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), and that if any cause of action did exist, it would be barred by the statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4), Fla.Stat. (1989). The order under review is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

568 So. 2d 976, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7671, 1990 WL 149810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vergara-v-butter-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack