Verga v. Scaduto
This text of 99 A.D.2d 534 (Verga v. Scaduto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondent McConnell to cancel a treasurer’s tax deed to certain real property and to compel respondent Scaduto to receive and accept payment from petitioners on a tax lien on said property, Rhoda Sweet appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), entered March 26, 1982, which, inter alia, awarded attorney’s fees to the petitioners, and (2) a judgment of the same court (Becker, J.), entered November 3,1982, which, inter alia, granted the petition, ordered a hearing on petitioners’ motion to punish her and her attorney for contempt of court, and assessed costs against her in the amount of $266.90. The appeal from the judgment brings up for review a resettled order of the same court (Levitt, J.), dated June 22, 1982, which amended the order entered March 26,1982, to delete the provision for attorney’s fees (CPLR 5517, subd [b]). Appeal from the order entered March 26,1982 dismissed. Said order will be reviewed on the appeal from the judgment. On the court’s own motion, those branches of the appeal from so much of the judgment as ordered a hearing on petitioners’ application to punish Sweet and her attorney are dismissed. No appeal lies from an order directing a hearing (see Bagdy v Progresso Foods Corp., 86 AD2d 589). Sweet failed to move for retaxation of costs before Special Term. Accordingly, we also dismiss that branch of the appeal (see CPLR 8404; McLaughlin, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C8404:l). Judgment affirmed, insofar as properly appealed from. No opinion. Petitioners are awarded one bill of costs. Gibbons, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 A.D.2d 534, 471 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/verga-v-scaduto-nyappdiv-1984.