Verduzco v. Comm'r

2010 T.C. Memo. 278, 100 T.C.M. 558, 2010 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 318
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedDecember 20, 2010
DocketDocket No. 21807-08
StatusUnpublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2010 T.C. Memo. 278 (Verduzco v. Comm'r) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Verduzco v. Comm'r, 2010 T.C. Memo. 278, 100 T.C.M. 558, 2010 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 318 (tax 2010).

Opinion

MANUEL VERDUZCO, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Verduzco v. Comm'r
Docket No. 21807-08
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 2010-278; 2010 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 318; 100 T.C.M. (CCH) 558;
December 20, 2010, Filed
*318

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

Manuel Verduzco, pro se.
Daniel N. Price, for respondent.
THORNTON, Judge.

THORNTON
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

THORNTON, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies and additions to tax with respect to petitioner's Federal income taxes for taxable years 2001 through 2003, as follows:

YearDeficiencySec. 6651(a)(1)Additions to Tax Sec. 6651(a)(2)Sec. 6654
2001$59,330$7,472$8,302$1,214
200227,7796,2506,945928
200321,3723,9551443
1 The notice of deficiency states that this amount will be computed at a later date.

Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years at issue, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. Figures have been rounded to the nearest dollar.

The parties have stipulated that petitioner's deficiencies are $44,803, $12,509, and $11,339 for taxable years 2001, 2002, and 2003, respectively. Respondent has conceded the section 6654 addition to tax for 2001. Therefore, the sole issues remaining for decision relate to petitioner's liability for the other additions to tax.

FINDINGS OF FACT

The parties have stipulated some facts, which we incorporate by this *319 reference. When he petitioned the Court, petitioner resided in Texas.

Petitioner holds a bachelor's degree in electrical engineering and a master's degree in technology management. He served 12 years in the U.S. Air Force. For part of that time he was deployed in Operation Desert Storm. In 1991 he was honorably discharged.

By 1998 petitioner was director of communications and information systems for the city of Las Cruces, New Mexico, a management position in which he directly supervised three technicians. In 1999 he began working for the Santa Clara Health and Hospital System in San Jose, California, directly managing 5 employees and indirectly supervising about 200 other employees and subcontractors who reported to him. In 2003 petitioner became director of technology services, and later payroll office administrator, for an independent school district in the El Paso area. In addition, since at least 1999 and throughout the years at issue petitioner has been sole proprietor of his own technology consulting business. During the years at issue petitioner was working 14 to 16 hours a day.

In 2000 petitioner's accountant informed him that he was running behind on petitioner's tax paperwork *320 but that he would catch up soon. By May 2001 the accountant informed petitioner that he would no longer be able to maintain petitioner's books because his mother had passed away. Petitioner began to handle his own recordkeeping until, at some unspecified date, he engaged another accountant.

After the events of September 11, 2001, and the commencement of the Afghan war, petitioner began to experience anxiety, for which his doctor prescribed medication. He was never diagnosed with Gulf War illness syndrome or posttraumatic stress disorder.

In June 2003 petitioner's father became very ill and was diagnosed with several medical problems. It was then that petitioner moved to El Paso, where he has actively cared for his father while working full time.

Petitioner did not file timely Federal income tax returns for the years 2001 through 2003. Pursuant to section 6020(b) respondent prepared substitutes for returns (SFRs) for petitioner's years 2001, 2002, and 2003. On the basis of the SFRs respondent determined income tax deficiencies for the years at issue and additions to tax for failure to file, failure to pay, and failure to pay estimated tax. 1 After receiving the notice of deficiency petitioner *321

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. Comm'r
2014 T.C. Memo. 122 (U.S. Tax Court, 2014)
Ellis v. Comm'r
2012 T.C. Memo. 250 (U.S. Tax Court, 2012)
Murray v. Comm'r
2012 T.C. Memo. 213 (U.S. Tax Court, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2010 T.C. Memo. 278, 100 T.C.M. 558, 2010 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/verduzco-v-commr-tax-2010.