Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Verdugo v. POWERCOM ELECTRICAL CONTRACTING

Verdugo v. POWERCOM ELECTRICAL CONTRACTING

8 So. 3d 498, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5119, 2009 WL 1313203
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 13, 2009
Docket1D06-6125
StatusPublished

This text of 8 So. 3d 498 (Verdugo v. POWERCOM ELECTRICAL CONTRACTING) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Verdugo v. POWERCOM ELECTRICAL CONTRACTING, 8 So. 3d 498, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5119, 2009 WL 1313203 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for certification is DENIED. The Judge of Compensation Claims is AFFIRMED. See Demedrano v. Labor Finders of the Treasure Coast & Amisure Ins., No. 1D06-6122, 8 So.3d 498, 2009 WL 1313223 (Fla. 1st DCA May 13, 2009).

KAHN, BENTON, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Demedrano v. Labor Finders of the Treasure Coast
8 So. 3d 498 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 So. 3d 498, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5119, 2009 WL 1313203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/verdugo-v-powercom-electrical-contracting-fladistctapp-2009.