Verdin v. Kondylis

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Verdin v. Kondylis

214 So. 2d 720, 252 La. 902

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 30, 1968·No. No. 49542·Published

Opinion

In re: loannis (Johnny) ICondylis applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writs refused. It does not appear that applicant has exhausted his remedies in the Court of Appeal, which court has appellate jurisdiction of the main demand and hence general supervisory jurisdiction of the matter. See Section 29, Article 7, Louisiana Constitution (as amended) and, particularly, Tolbert v. Thomas, 245 La. 200, 157 So.2d 737.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: loannis (Johnny) ICondylis applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writs refused. It does not appear that applicant has exhausted his remedies in the Court of Appeal, which court has appellate jurisdiction of the main demand and hence general supervisory jurisdiction of the matter. See Section 29, Article 7, Louisiana Constitution (as amended) and, particularly, Tolbert v. Thomas, 245 La. 200, 157 So.2d 737.

Verdin v. Kondylis, 214 So. 2d 720, 252 La. 902 (La. 1968).

Pincite

214 So. 2d 720 (Verdin v. Kondylis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related