Verdin v. Kondylis

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Verdin v. Kondylis

214 So. 2d 720, 252 La. 902

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 30, 1968

DocketNo. 49542

StatusPublished

This text of 214 So. 2d 720 (Verdin v. Kondylis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Verdin v. Kondylis, 214 So. 2d 720, 252 La. 902 (La. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: loannis (Johnny) ICondylis applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writs refused. It does not appear that applicant has exhausted his remedies in the Court of Appeal, which court has appellate jurisdiction of the main demand and hence general supervisory jurisdiction of the matter. See Section 29, Article 7, Louisiana Constitution (as amended) and, particularly, Tolbert v. Thomas, 245 La. 200, 157 So.2d 737.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: loannis (Johnny) ICondylis applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writs refused. It does not appear that applicant has exhausted his remedies in the Court of Appeal, which court has appellate jurisdiction of the main demand and hence general supervisory jurisdiction of the matter. See Section 29, Article 7, Louisiana Constitution (as amended) and, particularly, Tolbert v. Thomas, 245 La. 200, 157 So.2d 737.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 So. 2d 720, 252 La. 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/verdin-v-kondylis-la-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack