Verdier v. Youngblood

9 S.C. Eq. 220
CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedApril 15, 1832
StatusPublished

This text of 9 S.C. Eq. 220 (Verdier v. Youngblood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Verdier v. Youngblood, 9 S.C. Eq. 220 (S.C. Ct. App. 1832).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur with the Chancellor, for the very satisfactory reasons stated in the decree; which is therefore affirmed, and the appeal dismissed. Costs to be paid out of the fund.

Johnson, O’Neall and Harper, JJ., concurring.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 S.C. Eq. 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/verdier-v-youngblood-scctapp-1832.