Verden v. Coleman

59 U.S. 86, 15 L. Ed. 272, 18 How. 86, 1855 U.S. LEXIS 666
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 21, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 59 U.S. 86 (Verden v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Verden v. Coleman, 59 U.S. 86, 15 L. Ed. 272, 18 How. 86, 1855 U.S. LEXIS 666 (1855).

Opinion

Mr. Justice CAMPBELL

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff filed Ms bill in the circuit' court of Benton county, Indiana, sitting in chancery, to obtain a decree to cancel a mortgage and the mortgage note, and also to restrain,, by injunction, the mortgagee from proceeding upon the power of sale contained in the mortgage until the final hearing, and from thence perpetually.

A temporary injunction was granted in vacation upon the usual conditions, which was dissolved, on the coming in of the answers Upon the motion of the defendants, by the circuit court.

From the order dissolving the; injunction there was an appeal to the supreme court of Indiana, where, after argument, the decree .of the circuit court was .affirmed. Upon tMs decree this writ of error is prosecuted.

This court has repeatedly decided that a decree upon a motion .to dissolve an injunction in the course of a chancery cause, and where the bill is hot finally disposed of, is not such a final decree as can be reexamined in this court, under the terms of the 25th section of the judiciary act of the 24th September, 1789. McCollum v. Eager, 2 How. 61; Gibbons v. Ogden, 6 Wheat. 448.

The writ of error is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Quill
303 U.S. 621 (Supreme Court, 1938)
Musser v. Sheppard
299 U.S. 513 (Supreme Court, 1936)
Atlanta Laundries, Inc. v. City of Newman
286 U.S. 526 (Supreme Court, 1932)
Gant v. Oklahoma City
284 U.S. 594 (Supreme Court, 1932)
Brannan v. Harrison
284 U.S. 579 (Supreme Court, 1931)
Twin City Power Co. v. Savannah River Electric Co.
284 U.S. 574 (Supreme Court, 1931)
Augusta Power Co. v. Savannah River Electric Co.
284 U.S. 574 (Supreme Court, 1931)
Denver & R. G. R. v. Walker
68 F. 23 (Eighth Circuit, 1895)
Norton v. Hood
12 F. 763 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana, 1882)
Ableman v. Booth
11 Wis. 498 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1859)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 U.S. 86, 15 L. Ed. 272, 18 How. 86, 1855 U.S. LEXIS 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/verden-v-coleman-scotus-1855.