Vercruysse v. Alati

78 A.D.2d 1015, 433 N.Y.S.2d 694, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13805
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 1980·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The exclusive remedy provisions of subdivision 6 of section 29 of the Workers’ Compensation Law do not bar an employee who has accepted workers’ compensation benefits from bringing a common-law cause of action against a coemployee who has committed an intentional assault upon him (Maines v Cronomer Val. Fire Dept., 50 NY2d 535; Mazarredo v Levine, 274 App Div 122; cf. Smith v State of New York, 72 AD2d 937). (Appeal from order of Monroe Supreme Court — dismiss complaint.) Present — Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vercruysse v. Alati, 78 A.D.2d 1015, 433 N.Y.S.2d 694, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

78 A.D.2d 1015 (Vercruysse v. Alati) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ralph v. Oliver
186 A.D.2d 977 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Christey v. Gelyon
88 A.D.2d 769 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Werner v. State of New York
424 N.E.2d 541 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Werner v. State
79 A.D.2d 873 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)