Verboys v. Town of Ramapo

301 A.D.2d 647, 753 N.Y.S.2d 872
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Verboys v. Town of Ramapo. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 A.D.3d 665

Opinion

—In an [648]*648action, inter alia, to recover damages for malicious prosecution, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rock-land County (O’Rourke, J.), dated December 10, 2001, which, granted the motion of the defendants Town of Ramapo and Town of Ramapo Police Department, in effect, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

After the respondents made out a prima facie case for summary judgment, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact that the respondents may be held liable for malicious prosecution (see Smith-Hunter v Harvey, 95 NY2d 191; Hopkinson v Lehigh Val. R.R. Co., 249 NY 296; Goddard v Daly, 295 AD2d 314; Quigley v City of Auburn, 267 AD2d 978; Viza v Town of Greece, 94 AD2d 965).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Luciano, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Verboys v. Town of Ramapo, 301 A.D.2d 647, 753 N.Y.S.2d 872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

301 A.D.2d 647 (Verboys v. Town of Ramapo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith-Hunter v. Harvey
734 N.E.2d 750 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
Hopkinson v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.
164 N.E. 104 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)
Viza v. Town of Greece
94 A.D.2d 965 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Quigley v. City of Auburn
267 A.D.2d 978 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Goddard v. Daly
295 A.D.2d 314 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)