Veracierta v. State

589 So. 2d 950, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10635, 1991 WL 215972
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 25, 1991·No. No. 90-02866·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Leonardo Veracierta, raises two points on appeal, neither of which do we find has any merit. We write only to remand the costs portion of appellant’s sentence and direct the trial court to use the correct judgment form to reflect the actual costs imposed pursuant to current applicable statutes.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Veracierta v. State, 589 So. 2d 950, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10635, 1991 WL 215972 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

589 So. 2d 950 (Veracierta v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Long v. State
624 So. 2d 841 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Newsome v. State
623 So. 2d 1250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
James A. Cummings, Inc. v. Young
589 So. 2d 950 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)