Veracierta v. State

589 So. 2d 950, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10635, 1991 WL 215972
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 25, 1991
DocketNo. 90-02866
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 589 So. 2d 950 (Veracierta v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Veracierta v. State, 589 So. 2d 950, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10635, 1991 WL 215972 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Leonardo Veracierta, raises two points on appeal, neither of which do we find has any merit. We write only to remand the costs portion of appellant’s sentence and direct the trial court to use the correct judgment form to reflect the actual costs imposed pursuant to current applicable statutes.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Long v. State
624 So. 2d 841 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Newsome v. State
623 So. 2d 1250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
James A. Cummings, Inc. v. Young
589 So. 2d 950 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
589 So. 2d 950, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10635, 1991 WL 215972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veracierta-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.