Vera v. D. V. Brooks Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Vera v. D. V. Brooks Co.

94 S.W.2d 132, 127 Tex. 306, 1936 Tex. LEXIS 324

CourtTexas Commission of Appeals

DecidedMay 13, 1936

DocketNo. 1609-6502

StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.W.2d 132 (Vera v. D. V. Brooks Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vera v. D. V. Brooks Co., 94 S.W.2d 132, 127 Tex. 306, 1936 Tex. LEXIS 324 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

SMEDLEY, Commissioner.

Plaintiffs in error sued defendant in error in the county court at law of Tarrant county to recover $257 due upon several promissory notes, with interest and attorney’s fees, and for foreclosure of a chattel mortgage on an automobile given to secure the notes. The petition contained no allegation of the value of the automobile, but its value, in an amount within the court’s jurisdiction, was stated in an affidavit for sequestration filed by the plaintiffs on the day the suit was filed. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed the trial court’s judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and remanded the cause. 58 S.W.(2d) 1061. The question presented is the same as that this day decided in Mrs. C. B. Brown et al. v. C. C. Peters, 94 S.W.(2d) 129, a companion case.

The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is affirmed.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SMEDLEY, Commissioner.

Plaintiffs in error sued defendant in error in the county court at law of Tarrant county to recover $257 due upon several promissory notes, with interest and attorney’s fees, and for foreclosure of a chattel mortgage on an automobile given to secure the notes. The petition contained no allegation of the value of the automobile, but its value, in an amount within the court’s jurisdiction, was stated in an affidavit for sequestration filed by the plaintiffs on the day the suit was filed. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed the trial court’s judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and remanded the cause. 58 S.W.(2d) 1061. The question presented is the same as that this day decided in Mrs. C. B. Brown et al. v. C. C. Peters, 94 S.W.(2d) 129, a companion case.

The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is affirmed.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.'

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 S.W.2d 132, 127 Tex. 306, 1936 Tex. LEXIS 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vera-v-d-v-brooks-co-texcommnapp-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack