Vera v. D. v. Brooks Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Vera v. D. v. Brooks Co.

94 S.W.2d 132, 127 Tex. 306

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedMay 13, 1936

DocketNo. 6502.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 94 S.W.2d 132 (Vera v. D. v. Brooks Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vera v. D. v. Brooks Co., 94 S.W.2d 132, 127 Tex. 306 (Tex. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Judge SMEDLEY

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.

Plaintiffs in error sued defendant in error in the County Court at Law of Tarrant County to recover $257.00 due upon several promissory notes, with interest and attorney’s fees, and for foreclosure of a chattel mortgage on an automobile given to secure the notes. The petition contained no allegation of the value of the automobile, but its value, in an amount within the court’s jurisdiction, was stated in an affidavit for sequestration filed by the plaintiffs on the day the suit was filed. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed the trial court’s judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and remanded the cause. 58 S. W. (2d) 1061. The question presented is the same as that this day decided in Mrs. C. B. Brown et al. v. C. C. Peters, a companion *307 case (ante, p. 300). The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is affirmed.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court May 13, 1936.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Judge SMEDLEY

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.

Plaintiffs in error sued defendant in error in the County Court at Law of Tarrant County to recover $257.00 due upon several promissory notes, with interest and attorney’s fees, and for foreclosure of a chattel mortgage on an automobile given to secure the notes. The petition contained no allegation of the value of the automobile, but its value, in an amount within the court’s jurisdiction, was stated in an affidavit for sequestration filed by the plaintiffs on the day the suit was filed. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed the trial court’s judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and remanded the cause. 58 S. W. (2d) 1061. The question presented is the same as that this day decided in Mrs. C. B. Brown et al. v. C. C. Peters, a companion *307 case (ante, p. 300). The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is affirmed.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court May 13, 1936.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 S.W.2d 132, 127 Tex. 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vera-v-d-v-brooks-co-tex-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack