Vera v. Cogburn
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-10051 Conference Calendar
ALCARIO VERA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
BEVERLY COGBURN, Head Nurse; LISA JENNIFER BRIDE, Nurse; D. RAINS, LVN Nurse,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:95-CV-20 - - - - - - - - - - June 26, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Alcario Vera, #657497, appeals from the district court’s
dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) of his civil
rights complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Vera contends
that the magistrate judge erred by dismissing his complaint for
failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and in
the alternative, based on the defendants’ assertion of qualified
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-10051 - 2 -
immunity. We have reviewed the record, the magistrate judge’s
order of dismissal, and Vera’s arguments on appeal and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED for
essentially the same reasons stated by the magistrate judge.
Vera v. Cogburn et al., No. 1:95-CV-020 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 2, 1996).
We caution Vera that any additional frivolous appeals filed by
him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To
avoid sanctions, Vera is further cautioned to review any pending
appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are
frivolous.
AFFIRMED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vera v. Cogburn (Vera v. Cogburn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.