Venzal v. State
601 So. 2d 644, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8575, 1992 WL 175562
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 28, 1992·No. No. 91-1977·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Affirmed. Asay v. State, 580 So.2d 610 (Fla.) (whether premeditation was formed prior to killing is question of fact that may be established by circumstantial evidence), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 265, 116 L.Ed.2d 218 (1991). See also Dino v. State, 405 So.2d 213 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (intent to kill does not have to be contemplated for any particular length of time and may occur moment before act), rev. denied, 413 So.2d 875 (Fla.1982).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Venzal v. State, 601 So. 2d 644, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8575, 1992 WL 175562 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
601 So. 2d 644 (Venzal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Duque v. State
619 So. 2d 459 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Randall v. State
601 So. 2d 644 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)