Venzal v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Venzal v. State

601 So. 2d 644, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8575, 1992 WL 175562

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 28, 1992

DocketNo. 91-1977

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 601 So. 2d 644 (Venzal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Venzal v. State, 601 So. 2d 644, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8575, 1992 WL 175562 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Asay v. State, 580 So.2d 610 (Fla.) (whether premeditation was formed prior to killing is question of fact that may be established by circumstantial evidence), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 265, 116 L.Ed.2d 218 (1991). See also Dino v. State, 405 So.2d 213 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (intent to kill does not have to be contemplated for any particular length of time and may occur moment before act), rev. denied, 413 So.2d 875 (Fla.1982).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Asay v. State, 580 So.2d 610 (Fla.) (whether premeditation was formed prior to killing is question of fact that may be established by circumstantial evidence), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 265, 116 L.Ed.2d 218 (1991). See also Dino v. State, 405 So.2d 213 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (intent to kill does not have to be contemplated for any particular length of time and may occur moment before act), rev. denied, 413 So.2d 875 (Fla.1982).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

601 So. 2d 644, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8575, 1992 WL 175562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/venzal-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack