Venz v. Venz

Missouri Court of Appeals

Venz v. Venz

888 S.W.2d 337, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1684, 1994 WL 593119

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 1, 1994·No. No. 65272·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Tamara E. Venz (“wife”), appeals from a default decree of dissolution entered in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County granting respondent, William A. Venz (“husband”), custody of the parties’ two minor children. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the circuit court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Tamara E. Venz (“wife”), appeals from a default decree of dissolution entered in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County granting respondent, William A. Venz (“husband”), custody of the parties’ two minor children. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the circuit court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Venz v. Venz, 888 S.W.2d 337, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1684, 1994 WL 593119 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

888 S.W.2d 337 (Venz v. Venz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.