Venuti v. Voisins of Newburgh, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Venuti v. Voisins of Newburgh, Inc.

31 A.D.3d 439, 817 N.Y.S.2d 509

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 5, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.3d 439 (Venuti v. Voisins of Newburgh, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Venuti v. Voisins of Newburgh, Inc., 31 A.D.3d 439, 817 N.Y.S.2d 509 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated January 14, 2005, which granted the defendants’ respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

In support of their respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, the defendants met their prima facie burden of establishing their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Florio, J.P., Santucci, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated January 14, 2005, which granted the defendants’ respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

In support of their respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, the defendants met their prima facie burden of establishing their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Florio, J.P., Santucci, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.3d 439, 817 N.Y.S.2d 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/venuti-v-voisins-of-newburgh-inc-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack