Venture Corp. of Sarasota v. Department of Business Regulation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Venture Corp. of Sarasota v. Department of Business Regulation

557 So. 2d 686, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1343, 1990 WL 20385

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 8, 1990

DocketNo. 89-245

StatusPublished

This text of 557 So. 2d 686 (Venture Corp. of Sarasota v. Department of Business Regulation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Venture Corp. of Sarasota v. Department of Business Regulation, 557 So. 2d 686, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1343, 1990 WL 20385 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

DANIEL, Chief Judge.

This is an administrative appeal of an order entered by the Department of Business Regulation against Venture Corporation of Sarasota, Inc., Donald Kun, Sr. and Donald Kun, Jr. for violations of the Flor-lda Condominium Act and the Florida Uniform Land Sales Practices Act. As this court has previously noted, the scope of review of an administrative action is narrow and an appellate court is bound to affirm administrative determinations or findings unless there is no competent substantial evidence to support them. Clark v. Department of Professional Regulation, 463 So.2d 328 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). See also § 120.68(10), Fla.Stat. (1989). After a careful review of the record, we conclude that there is no competent substantial evidence to support liability on the part of Donald Kun, Jr. Accordingly, we reverse the order in so far as it imposes sanctions against him.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

W. SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DANIEL, Chief Judge.

This is an administrative appeal of an order entered by the Department of Business Regulation against Venture Corporation of Sarasota, Inc., Donald Kun, Sr. and Donald Kun, Jr. for violations of the Flor-lda Condominium Act and the Florida Uniform Land Sales Practices Act. As this court has previously noted, the scope of review of an administrative action is narrow and an appellate court is bound to affirm administrative determinations or findings unless there is no competent substantial evidence to support them. Clark v. Department of Professional Regulation, 463 So.2d 328 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). See also § 120.68(10), Fla.Stat. (1989). After a careful review of the record, we conclude that there is no competent substantial evidence to support liability on the part of Donald Kun, Jr. Accordingly, we reverse the order in so far as it imposes sanctions against him.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

W. SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

557 So. 2d 686, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1343, 1990 WL 20385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/venture-corp-of-sarasota-v-department-of-business-regulation-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack