Ventura v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 17, 2019·No. 18-2411·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed April 17, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D18-2411 Lower Tribunal Nos. 17-11762; 16-18158; 16-17619; 16-20175 & 16-20177 ________________

Francisco Ventura, Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal from non-final orders from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L. Fernandez and Marisa Tinkler-Mendez, Judges.

Francisco Ventura, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE, and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s order denying Appellant’s motion to dismiss on the basis of

Stand-Your-Ground immunity, which was entered after an evidentiary hearing, is affirmed. The appeals of the orders denying the motion to dismiss for violations of

Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), the motion to protect all of the accused’s

constitutional rights, and the motion to identify subject matter jurisdiction are

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ventura v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Ventura v. State (Ventura v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brady v. Maryland
373 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1963)