Ventura Union High School District v. Van Delinder

California Court of Appeal

Ventura Union High School District v. Van Delinder

4 Cal. App. 2d 669

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 20, 1935

DocketCiv. No. 10061

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 Cal. App. 2d 669 (Ventura Union High School District v. Van Delinder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ventura Union High School District v. Van Delinder, 4 Cal. App. 2d 669 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

A warrant for the payment of a sum of money was regularly drawn upon the treasurer of Ventura County for the purchase of land to be used for high school purposes. The treasurer of the county refused ■ payment upon several grounds. The high school district filed a petition in mandate with this court to compel the treasurer to honor the warrant. A return was made in which certain issues of fact were raised and the court appointed its presiding justice to proceed to the city of Ventura and there take evidence as the court’s referee.

[670]*670The presiding justice complied therewith and has reported to this court to the effect that the allegations of fraud upon which the issues arose have been withdrawn and that the said referred-to warrant has been paid.

Wherefore it is ordered that the proceedings be and they' are hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

A warrant for the payment of a sum of money was regularly drawn upon the treasurer of Ventura County for the purchase of land to be used for high school purposes. The treasurer of the county refused ■ payment upon several grounds. The high school district filed a petition in mandate with this court to compel the treasurer to honor the warrant. A return was made in which certain issues of fact were raised and the court appointed its presiding justice to proceed to the city of Ventura and there take evidence as the court’s referee.

[670]*670The presiding justice complied therewith and has reported to this court to the effect that the allegations of fraud upon which the issues arose have been withdrawn and that the said referred-to warrant has been paid.

Wherefore it is ordered that the proceedings be and they' are hereby dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Cal. App. 2d 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ventura-union-high-school-district-v-van-delinder-calctapp-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack