Ventrone v. Tarancki

32 A.D.2d 738, 302 N.Y.S.2d 108, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4006
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1969·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The alleged tortious act upon which plaintiff bases his cause of action was independent of and not related to the common employment of the parties to the action. The fact that the act occurred upon the employer’s premises (cf. Doyle v. Jennings, 31 A D 2d 608) is not controlling because of the intervention of [739]*739the over-riding and independent alleged wrongful conduct of defendants which had no relationship to common employment (ef. Matter of Marks v. Freeman Bus Corp., 28 A D 2d 751). (Appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term granting motion to dismiss defense of Workmen’s Compensation Law.) Present —'Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Bastow and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ventrone v. Tarancki, 32 A.D.2d 738, 302 N.Y.S.2d 108, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4006 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

32 A.D.2d 738 (Ventrone v. Tarancki) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knowlton v. Tranter, Inc.
672 P.2d 686 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 1983)
Maines v. Cronomer Valley Fire Dept., Inc.
407 N.E.2d 466 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)