Ventnor Trust Co. v. LaBree

176 A. 324, 13 N.J. Misc. 123, 1935 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 373
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 24, 1935
StatusPublished

This text of 176 A. 324 (Ventnor Trust Co. v. LaBree) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ventnor Trust Co. v. LaBree, 176 A. 324, 13 N.J. Misc. 123, 1935 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 373 (N.J. 1935).

Opinion

Brogan, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment for the defendant in the Common Pleas Court of Atlantic county.

There are three reasons advanced for a reversal of the judgment: (1) that the judgment is contrary to law; (2) that the trial court refused to direct a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and (3) that the trial court erroneously charged the jury.

A rule to show cause which was allowed and later, after argument, discharged, was based upon the reasons that the verdict of the jury was against the weight of the evidence and contrary to the charge of the court.

These questions having been settled by the discharge of the rule, there is therefore no question before us on appeal which is not within the scope of the rule to show cause which was argued and consequently there is no appealable ground before us. Cleaves v. Yeskel, 104 N. J. L. 497; 141 Atl. Rep. 814.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cleaves v. Yeskel
141 A. 814 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 A. 324, 13 N.J. Misc. 123, 1935 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ventnor-trust-co-v-labree-nj-1935.