Ventimiglia v. Twist

Eighth Circuit

Ventimiglia v. Twist

128 F. App'x 560

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 5, 2005·No. No. 04-2441·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Vincent M. Ventimiglia appeals the district court’s¹ dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons the district court stated. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Vincent M. Ventimiglia appeals the district court’s¹ dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons the district court stated. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Ventimiglia v. Twist, 128 F. App'x 560 (8th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

128 F. App'x 560 (Ventimiglia v. Twist) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related