Ventimiglia v. ST. LOUIS, COG

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ventimiglia v. ST. LOUIS, COG

284 S.W.3d 681, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 392

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 24, 2009·No. ED 91597·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vincent and Debbie Ventimiglia, and N.V. and J.V., minors, appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their petition with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not commit error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vincent and Debbie Ventimiglia, and N.V. and J.V., minors, appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their petition with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not commit error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Ventimiglia v. ST. LOUIS, COG, 284 S.W.3d 681, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 392 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

284 S.W.3d 681 (Ventimiglia v. ST. LOUIS, COG) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related