Ventimiglia v. ST. LOUIS, COG

284 S.W.3d 681, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 392
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 24, 2009
DocketED 91597
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 284 S.W.3d 681 (Ventimiglia v. ST. LOUIS, COG) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ventimiglia v. ST. LOUIS, COG, 284 S.W.3d 681, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 392 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vincent and Debbie Ventimiglia, and N.V. and J.V., minors, appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their petition with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not commit error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Swaim
284 S.W.3d 681 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
284 S.W.3d 681, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ventimiglia-v-st-louis-cog-moctapp-2009.