Veno v. Saleh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Veno v. Saleh

306 A.D.2d 876, 760 N.Y.S.2d 913, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6720

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 306 A.D.2d 876 (Veno v. Saleh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Veno v. Saleh, 306 A.D.2d 876, 760 N.Y.S.2d 913, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6720 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County (NeMoyer, J.), entered October 5, 2001, which reduced the lien of the Cattaraugus County Department of Social Services on the proceeds of a medical malpractice settlement between plaintiff and defendant.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the original lien is reinstated.

Memorandum: The Cattaraugus County Department of Social Services (DSS) appeals from an order reducing its medical assistance lien on the proceeds of a medical malpractice settlement between plaintiff and defendant doctor. Plaintiff commenced a medical malpractice action against defendant on [877]*877behalf of his infant son. During trial, the parties agreed to settle the action for $465,000. DSS held a lien for $116,000 in Medicaid benefits that had been paid on behalf of the infant, which it refused to compromise. Plaintiff moved for a hearing before Supreme Court to allocate the settlement amount, and the court reduced the lien to $11,600.

We agree with DSS that the court exceeded its authority in reducing the lien. The Court of Appeals has held that all settlement proceeds are available to satisfy a Medicaid lien (see Gold v United Health Servs. Hosps., 95 NY2d 683, 690-692 [2001]; Calvanese v Calvanese, 93 NY2d 111, 116-119 [1999]). “Once a Medicaid lien is in effect, only the local public welfare official may release and discharge it, and ‘no release, payment, discharge or satisfaction of any * * * claim, demand, right of action, suit or counterclaim shall be valid or effective against such lien’ (Social Services Law § 104-b [7])” (id. at 119).

Consequently, we reverse the order and reinstate the original lien. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Wisner, Scudder, Burns and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County (NeMoyer, J.), entered October 5, 2001, which reduced the lien of the Cattaraugus County Department of Social Services on the proceeds of a medical malpractice settlement between plaintiff and defendant.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the original lien is reinstated.

Memorandum: The Cattaraugus County Department of Social Services (DSS) appeals from an order reducing its medical assistance lien on the proceeds of a medical malpractice settlement between plaintiff and defendant doctor. Plaintiff commenced a medical malpractice action against defendant on [877]*877behalf of his infant son. During trial, the parties agreed to settle the action for $465,000. DSS held a lien for $116,000 in Medicaid benefits that had been paid on behalf of the infant, which it refused to compromise. Plaintiff moved for a hearing before Supreme Court to allocate the settlement amount, and the court reduced the lien to $11,600.

We agree with DSS that the court exceeded its authority in reducing the lien. The Court of Appeals has held that all settlement proceeds are available to satisfy a Medicaid lien (see Gold v United Health Servs. Hosps., 95 NY2d 683, 690-692 [2001]; Calvanese v Calvanese, 93 NY2d 111, 116-119 [1999]). “Once a Medicaid lien is in effect, only the local public welfare official may release and discharge it, and ‘no release, payment, discharge or satisfaction of any * * * claim, demand, right of action, suit or counterclaim shall be valid or effective against such lien’ (Social Services Law § 104-b [7])” (id. at 119).

Consequently, we reverse the order and reinstate the original lien. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Wisner, Scudder, Burns and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 A.D.2d 876, 760 N.Y.S.2d 913, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veno-v-saleh-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack