Venner v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
123 N.E. 893, 226 N.Y. 583, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 934
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Venner v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co., 123 N.E. 893, 226 N.Y. 583, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 934 (N.Y. 1919).
123 N.E. 893 (Venner v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clayton v. Farish
191 Misc. 136 (New York Supreme Court, 1947)
Kalmanash v. Smith
51 N.E.2d 681 (New York Court of Appeals, 1943)
In re New York Central Railroad
233 A.D. 123 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Powers Film Products, Inc.
189 A.D. 556 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)