Venky Venkatraman v. Texas Board of Law Examiners
This text of Venky Venkatraman v. Texas Board of Law Examiners (Venky Venkatraman v. Texas Board of Law Examiners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-22-00519-CV
Venky Venkatraman, Appellant
v.
Texas Board of Law Examiners, Appellee
FROM THE 419TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-22-000521, THE HONORABLE AMY CLARK MEACHUM, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant has filed a “Motion to Abate Appeal for Trial Court to Consider Motion
to Vacate Order and Motion for Sanctions.” Appellee has filed a response representing that it is
not opposed to the motion to abate. We grant appellant’s motion, abate this appeal, and remand
this cause to the trial court so that it may consider appellant’s motion to vacate order and motion
for sanctions. A supplemental record containing the trial court’s rulings on appellant’s motions,
if any, shall be filed with this Court within thirty days from the date of the rulings. Appellant
shall file a status report with this Court on or before December 30, 2022. This appeal will be
reinstated after the supplemental clerk’s record, if any, is filed and will remain abated until
further order of this Court.
It is ordered on November 30, 2022. Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly
Abated and Remanded
Filed: November 30, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Venky Venkatraman v. Texas Board of Law Examiners, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/venky-venkatraman-v-texas-board-of-law-examiners-texapp-2022.