Venino v. Naegele
134 A. 920, 100 N.J. Eq. 357, 15 Stock. 357, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 570
This text of 134 A. 920 (Venino v. Naegele) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Venino v. Naegele, 134 A. 920, 100 N.J. Eq. 357, 15 Stock. 357, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 570 (N.J. 1926).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None. *Page 358
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Molokai Ranch, Ltd. v. Morris
36 Haw. 219 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1942)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
134 A. 920, 100 N.J. Eq. 357, 15 Stock. 357, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/venino-v-naegele-nj-1926.