Veniko Marquel Byrd v. State of Florida
This text of Veniko Marquel Byrd v. State of Florida (Veniko Marquel Byrd v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D18-5262 _____________________________
VENIKO MARQUEL BYRD,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
February 12, 2019
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied on the merits.
BILBREY, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Veniko Marquel Byrd, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Veniko Marquel Byrd v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veniko-marquel-byrd-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.