Veniero v. Veniero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Veniero v. Veniero

262 A.D. 738, 29 N.Y.S.2d 141, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5653

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 29, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D. 738 (Veniero v. Veniero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Veniero v. Veniero, 262 A.D. 738, 29 N.Y.S.2d 141, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5653 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

It is impossible to determine from the conflicting affidavits which appear in the record whether or not the defendants violated the terms of the stipulation of settlement. The only fact which the defendants do not dispute is the removal of the plaintiff as an officer, employee and director of the corporation. However, they assert that their action was justified because of his grievous misconduct [739]*739in connection with corporate affairs. We have determined, therefore, that the order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the controversy referred to an official referee to hear and report as soon as possible to Special Term. Settle order on notice. Present —: Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is impossible to determine from the conflicting affidavits which appear in the record whether or not the defendants violated the terms of the stipulation of settlement. The only fact which the defendants do not dispute is the removal of the plaintiff as an officer, employee and director of the corporation. However, they assert that their action was justified because of his grievous misconduct [739]*739in connection with corporate affairs. We have determined, therefore, that the order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the controversy referred to an official referee to hear and report as soon as possible to Special Term. Settle order on notice. Present —: Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 738, 29 N.Y.S.2d 141, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veniero-v-veniero-nyappdiv-1941.