Veney v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
This text of 211 A.2d 343 (Veney v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Applicant contends that this .Post Conviction proceeding should be determined under the provisions of Ch. 442 of the Acts of 1965. Without deciding that he is entitled as a matter of right to have his application so considered, we shall comply with his request.
For the reasons assigned by Judge Prendergast in his opinion below, the application will be denied.
Application denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
211 A.2d 343, 239 Md. 702, 1965 Md. LEXIS 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veney-v-warden-of-maryland-penitentiary-md-1965.