Veney v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

211 A.2d 343, 239 Md. 702, 1965 Md. LEXIS 604
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided July 2, 1965·No. App. No. 143·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Applicant contends that this .Post Conviction proceeding should be determined under the provisions of Ch. 442 of the Acts of 1965. Without deciding that he is entitled as a matter of right to have his application so considered, we shall comply with his request.

For the reasons assigned by Judge Prendergast in his opinion below, the application will be denied.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Veney v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 211 A.2d 343, 239 Md. 702, 1965 Md. LEXIS 604 (Md. 1965).

211 A.2d 343 (Veney v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.