Venetsanos v. Pappas

171 A. 925, 20 Del. Ch. 453, 1934 Del. Ch. LEXIS 55
Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided March 7, 1934·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Chancellor in Pappas v. Venetsanos, 19 Del. Ch. 347, 167 A. 842. The assignments of error are concerned with conclusions of fact which ought not to be disturbed except upon a clear showing of error in the conception and interpretation of the testimony. From a close examination of the lengthy record we are satisfied that the Chancellor’s conclusions were fully warranted. The decree is accordingly affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Venetsanos v. Pappas, 171 A. 925, 20 Del. Ch. 453, 1934 Del. Ch. LEXIS 55 (Del. 1934).

171 A. 925 (Venetsanos v. Pappas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ryan v. Ryan
298 A.2d 343 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1972)
Thomas v. King
95 A.2d 822 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1953)