Venetsanos v. Pappas

Supreme Court of Delaware

Venetsanos v. Pappas

171 A. 925, 20 Del. Ch. 453, 1934 Del. Ch. LEXIS 55

CourtSupreme Court of Delaware

DecidedMarch 7, 1934

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 171 A. 925 (Venetsanos v. Pappas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Venetsanos v. Pappas, 171 A. 925, 20 Del. Ch. 453, 1934 Del. Ch. LEXIS 55 (Del. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Chancellor in Pappas v. Venetsanos, 19 Del. Ch. 347, 167 A. 842. The assignments of error are concerned with conclusions of fact which ought not to be disturbed except upon a clear showing of error in the conception and interpretation of the testimony. From a close examination of the lengthy record we are satisfied that the Chancellor’s conclusions were fully warranted. The decree is accordingly affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Chancellor in Pappas v. Venetsanos, 19 Del. Ch. 347, 167 A. 842. The assignments of error are concerned with conclusions of fact which ought not to be disturbed except upon a clear showing of error in the conception and interpretation of the testimony. From a close examination of the lengthy record we are satisfied that the Chancellor’s conclusions were fully warranted. The decree is accordingly affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 A. 925, 20 Del. Ch. 453, 1934 Del. Ch. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/venetsanos-v-pappas-del-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack