Venetianaire Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Venetianaire Corp. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 452

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 27, 1961

DocketNo. 65537; protest 59/31764 (Galveston)

StatusPublished

This text of 46 Cust. Ct. 452 (Venetianaire Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Venetianaire Corp. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 452 (cusc 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise contained in bales 231 to 245, inclusive, on entry 9045-H, described as bamboo valances with cotton tape, and that contained in bales 6008 to 6214, inclusive, on entry 8819-H, described as natural higo matchstick valances, consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of D. N. & E. Walter & Co. et al. v. United States (43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise contained in bales 231 to 245, inclusive, on entry 9045-H, described as bamboo valances with cotton tape, and that contained in bales 6008 to 6214, inclusive, on entry 8819-H, described as natural higo matchstick valances, consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of D. N. & E. Walter & Co. et al. v. United States (43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 Cust. Ct. 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/venetianaire-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack