Venetianaire Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Venetianaire Corp. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 452

United States Customs Court·Decided April 27, 1961·No. No. 65537; protest 59/31764 (Galveston)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise contained in bales 231 to 245, inclusive, on entry 9045-H, described as bamboo valances with cotton tape, and that contained in bales 6008 to 6214, inclusive, on entry 8819-H, described as natural higo matchstick valances, consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of D. N. & E. Walter & Co. et al. v. United States (43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise contained in bales 231 to 245, inclusive, on entry 9045-H, described as bamboo valances with cotton tape, and that contained in bales 6008 to 6214, inclusive, on entry 8819-H, described as natural higo matchstick valances, consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of D. N. & E. Walter & Co. et al. v. United States (43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Venetianaire Corp. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 452 (cusc 1961).

Pincite

46 Cust. Ct. 452 (Venetianaire Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related