Venessa Davis v. Sunoco Pipeline Limited Partnership
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 27, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano
161751 Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh Elizabeth M. Welch,
VENESSA DAVIS, JOHN DAVIS, RONALD Justices W. RADATZ, NEIL J. HAMANN, JACQUELINE A. HAMANN, DENNIS J. HAMANN, JOSEPH SHARPE, JR., MICHELLE SHARPE, JOHN A. ESCHENBERG, II, LEAH ESCHENBERG, TERRY MERCHANT, TERESA MERCHANT, CHARLES COGGINS, II, KIMBERLY COGGINS, and CHARLES COGGINS, III, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v SC: 161751 COA: 346729 St. Clair CC: 16-001197-CE SUNOCO PIPELINE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and SUNOCO LOGISTICS PARTNERS OPERATIONS GP, LLC, Defendants-Appellants,
and ENBRIDGE ENERGY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ENBRIDGE PIPELINES LAKEHEAD, LLC, ENBRIDGE PIPELINES TOLEDO, INC., GREAT LAKES PETROLEUM CORPORATION, GREAT LAKE PETROLEUM COMPANY, and GREAT LAKES PETROLEUM TRANSPORTATION, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 18, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
April 27, 2021
s0419
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Venessa Davis v. Sunoco Pipeline Limited Partnership (Venessa Davis v. Sunoco Pipeline Limited Partnership) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.