Venero v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Venero v. State

868 So. 2d 679, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 4478, 2004 WL 625785

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 31, 2004

DocketNo. 3D02-3387

StatusPublished

This text of 868 So. 2d 679 (Venero v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Venero v. State, 868 So. 2d 679, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 4478, 2004 WL 625785 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse, in part, the order denying defendant’s post-conviction relief motion. The record does not conclusively refute defendant’s claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to move to sever the possession of a firearm by a violent career criminal charge. Therefore, we reverse the portion of the order denying relief on that basis and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse, in part, the order denying defendant’s post-conviction relief motion. The record does not conclusively refute defendant’s claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to move to sever the possession of a firearm by a violent career criminal charge. Therefore, we reverse the portion of the order denying relief on that basis and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

868 So. 2d 679, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 4478, 2004 WL 625785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/venero-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.