Vendrella v. Astriab Family Limited Partnership
This text of 41 A.3d 306 (Vendrella v. Astriab Family Limited Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Anthony VENDRELLA et al.
v.
ASTRIAB FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Lester Katz, Hartford, and Christian Sterling, in support of the petition.
William F. Gallagher, New Haven, and Hugh D. Hughes, in opposition.
The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 133 Conn.App. 630, 36 A.3d 707, is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a horse belongs to a species so naturally inclined to do mischief or be vicious to human beings that the minor plaintiffs injuries were reasonably foreseeable, regardless of whether the particular horse has shown a prior vicious disposition known to the keeper?"
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 A.3d 306, 304 Conn. 919, 2012 WL 1549992, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vendrella-v-astriab-family-limited-partnership-conn-2012.