Venditte v. Rohan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Venditte v. Rohan

3 A.D.2d 686, 159 N.Y.S.2d 213, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6642

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 24, 1957

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 A.D.2d 686 (Venditte v. Rohan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Venditte v. Rohan, 3 A.D.2d 686, 159 N.Y.S.2d 213, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6642 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

This is a proceeding to review an order of the State Liquor Authority which suspended petitioners’ liquor license for a period of 30 days. The order of suspension was made after a hearing, and was based upon a finding that petitioners violated subdivision 1 of section 65 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law in that they permitted liquor to be sold to a minor under the age of 18 years on an evening in November, 1954. The only issue involved is whether this finding was supported by substantial evidence. The minor herself testified at the hearing and it was for the Authority to determine the weight and credibility to be given to her testimony. We find nothing in the record which would permit us to say as a matter of law that her testimony was incredible. Order unanimously confirmed, without costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Gibson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is a proceeding to review an order of the State Liquor Authority which suspended petitioners’ liquor license for a period of 30 days. The order of suspension was made after a hearing, and was based upon a finding that petitioners violated subdivision 1 of section 65 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law in that they permitted liquor to be sold to a minor under the age of 18 years on an evening in November, 1954. The only issue involved is whether this finding was supported by substantial evidence. The minor herself testified at the hearing and it was for the Authority to determine the weight and credibility to be given to her testimony. We find nothing in the record which would permit us to say as a matter of law that her testimony was incredible. Order unanimously confirmed, without costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Gibson, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A.D.2d 686, 159 N.Y.S.2d 213, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/venditte-v-rohan-nyappdiv-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack