Vendikos v. Vendikos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vendikos v. Vendikos

54 A.D.2d 764, 387 N.Y.S.2d 698, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14429

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 25, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 764 (Vendikos v. Vendikos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vendikos v. Vendikos, 54 A.D.2d 764, 387 N.Y.S.2d 698, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14429 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a support proceeding, petitioner appeals (1) from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated January 20, 1976, which, after a hearing, inter alia, reduced the respondent father’s child support obligation and (2) from a further order of the same court, dated March 29, 1976, which denied her motion for reargument. Appeal from the order dated March 29, 1976 dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument. Order dated January 20, 1976 affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The sudden and substantial decline in respondent’s income since the prior award of support was made, due to no fault of his own, constitutes a change in circumstances which warrants a reduction of the child support award (see Rotbert v Rotbert, 47 AD2d 666; Matter of Bailey v Bailey, 34 AD2d 984). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a support proceeding, petitioner appeals (1) from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated January 20, 1976, which, after a hearing, inter alia, reduced the respondent father’s child support obligation and (2) from a further order of the same court, dated March 29, 1976, which denied her motion for reargument. Appeal from the order dated March 29, 1976 dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument. Order dated January 20, 1976 affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The sudden and substantial decline in respondent’s income since the prior award of support was made, due to no fault of his own, constitutes a change in circumstances which warrants a reduction of the child support award (see Rotbert v Rotbert, 47 AD2d 666; Matter of Bailey v Bailey, 34 AD2d 984). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 764, 387 N.Y.S.2d 698, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vendikos-v-vendikos-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack