Venable v. Smith
529 So. 2d 888, 1988 La. App. LEXIS 1806, 1988 WL 87852
This text of 529 So. 2d 888 (Venable v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Venable v. Smith, 529 So. 2d 888, 1988 La. App. LEXIS 1806, 1988 WL 87852 (La. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
WRIT DENIED: There is no error in the ruling complained of. An in camera inspection by the trial court to determine whether or not an attorney’s file contains discoverable material is not a violation of C.C.P. art. 1422 et seq. Also, see McHugh v. Chastant, 503 So.2d 791 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1987).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
St. Bernard Port, Harbor & Terminal Dist. v. Violet Dock Port, Inc.
246 So. 3d 23 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2018)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
529 So. 2d 888, 1988 La. App. LEXIS 1806, 1988 WL 87852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/venable-v-smith-lactapp-1988.