Venable v. Sanford
This text of 520 P.2d 959 (Venable v. Sanford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Mary B. Sanford commenced this action in the district court to recover $7,050, which she claimed was due and owing her from appellant, Douglas J. Venable. The court, sitting without a jury, found in favor of Mary. Douglas has appealed, seeking reversal on the ground that the judgment was not supported by the record.
The sole issue presented is whether there is substantial evidence in the proceedings below to support the findings of the court. Sala & Ruthe Realty, Inc. v. Deneen, 89 Nev. 98, 507 P.2d 140 (1973). We have reviewed the record, and we find that such evidence does exist. Therefore, we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
520 P.2d 959, 90 Nev. 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/venable-v-sanford-nev-1974.