Venable v. Sanford

520 P.2d 959, 90 Nev. 174
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedApril 19, 1974
DocketNo. 7298
StatusPublished

This text of 520 P.2d 959 (Venable v. Sanford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Venable v. Sanford, 520 P.2d 959, 90 Nev. 174 (Neb. 1974).

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Mary B. Sanford commenced this action in the district court to recover $7,050, which she claimed was due and owing her from appellant, Douglas J. Venable. The court, sitting without a jury, found in favor of Mary. Douglas has appealed, seeking reversal on the ground that the judgment was not supported by the record.

The sole issue presented is whether there is substantial evidence in the proceedings below to support the findings of the court. Sala & Ruthe Realty, Inc. v. Deneen, 89 Nev. 98, 507 P.2d 140 (1973). We have reviewed the record, and we find that such evidence does exist. Therefore, we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sala & Ruthe Realty, Inc. v. Deneen
507 P.2d 140 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
520 P.2d 959, 90 Nev. 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/venable-v-sanford-nev-1974.