Venable v. Russell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Venable v. Russell

115 S.E.2d 109, 216 Ga. 145, 1960 Ga. LEXIS 411

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 9, 1960·No. 20874·Published

Opinion

Hawkins, Justice.

This is a companion case to that of Russell v. Venable, ante, and is controlled by the rulings there made.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Submitted May 9, 1960 Decided June 9, 1960. Tindall •& Tindall, J. F. Kemp, for plaintiff in error. James R. Venable, Essley B. Burdine, Margaret Hopkins, Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, Paul Miller, Assistant Attorney-General, A. R. Barksdale, Wm. M. Mallet, Deputy Assistarit Attomeys-General, Clarence Peeler, George P. Dillard, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hawkins, Justice.

This is a companion case to that of Russell v. Venable, ante, and is controlled by the rulings there made.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Submitted May 9, 1960 Decided June 9, 1960. Tindall •& Tindall, J. F. Kemp, for plaintiff in error. James R. Venable, Essley B. Burdine, Margaret Hopkins, Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, Paul Miller, Assistant Attorney-General, A. R. Barksdale, Wm. M. Mallet, Deputy Assistarit Attomeys-General, Clarence Peeler, George P. Dillard, contra.

Venable v. Russell, 115 S.E.2d 109, 216 Ga. 145, 1960 Ga. LEXIS 411 (Ga. 1960).

Pincite

115 S.E.2d 109 (Venable v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.