Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Venable v. Russell

Venable v. Russell

115 S.E.2d 109, 216 Ga. 145, 1960 Ga. LEXIS 411
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 9, 1960
Docket20874
StatusPublished

This text of 115 S.E.2d 109 (Venable v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Venable v. Russell, 115 S.E.2d 109, 216 Ga. 145, 1960 Ga. LEXIS 411 (Ga. 1960).

Opinion

Hawkins, Justice.

This is a companion case to that of Russell v. Venable, ante, and is controlled by the rulings there made.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Submitted May 9, 1960 Decided June 9, 1960. Tindall •& Tindall, J. F. Kemp, for plaintiff in error. James R. Venable, Essley B. Burdine, Margaret Hopkins, Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, Paul Miller, Assistant Attorney-General, A. R. Barksdale, Wm. M. Mallet, Deputy Assistarit Attomeys-General, Clarence Peeler, George P. Dillard, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 S.E.2d 109, 216 Ga. 145, 1960 Ga. LEXIS 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/venable-v-russell-ga-1960.